International Large-Cap Value: The Forgotten Asset Class

Given the euphoria surrounding US equities, and technology stocks in particular, investors appear to have lost sight of the fact that there have been several extended periods of time during which international value stocks were in favor. At the outset of one of these time periods, the US dollar had appreciated by 40%, the S&P 500 had outperformed the EAFE Value Index by 7.2% (annualized over the 10 years prior), and the US equity market had become heavily concentrated in high-flying technology stocks. This was also a period when the 10-year treasury rate stood at 5.25% and world inflation at 3.4%, which is more closely aligned with today’s reality versus the world of zero inflation and zero interest rates for the decade following the global financial crisis. From a valuation standpoint, US equities were trading at a 24x NTM (next 12 month) valuation following a period of massive multiple expansion in a highly concentrated, tech-heavy US market. Sounds familiar, right? No, we’re not referring to today, but rather to January of 2001. We all know what happened next, as this was the backdrop in the lead up to the US’ dot-com bubble.

As of December 31, 2025, the US dollar has appreciated by 26% and the S&P 500 has outperformed EAFE Value by 9.7% (annualized, as noted previously, over the past 15 years). The 10-year treasury sits at 4.1%, the most recent reading on global inflation stands at 3.0% and the US market is trading at 22x NTM earnings.* Further, it has been over 20 years since the end of the last “AI winter,” and investors have now hung their hats on Large Language Models, a form of AI that has evolved into something nearly invaluable. That said, it is important to note that the mega-cap technology companies of today benefiting from investor exuberance around generative AI are in most cases high-quality businesses and not comparable to the Pets.com or the eToys of the dot-com era. However, if earnings or profit margins, subject to unprecedented capex spending, for these concentrated areas of the market don’t live up to the lofty expectations embedded in their stock prices, and if multiples de-rate, the relative value opportunity for international stocks, and international value stocks in particular, could be tremendous.

With that as the backdrop, what happened after the dot-com bubble is where we want to focus, as it will be the environment over the next 10 years, not the last 10, that will drive investor returns. Over the 2000s business cycle, from January of 2000 through December 2007, the MSCI EAFE Value Index generated an annualized return of 8.2%. This was nearly five times the return of the S&P 500, which generated a return of 1.7%, with its technology sector generating a return of -7.7% over that same period. While the 41% drop of the S&P 500’s price-to-earnings ratio over this period was a large driver of poor US market returns, the international value market’s 8% annualized return was driven entirely by earnings and dividends. In this context, it’s important to set the stage by comparing the market structure of the S&P 500 and the MSCI EAFE Value Index, as the two could not be more different. Perhaps the most notable difference — besides valuations still trading at over one standard deviation “cheap” relative to the S&P 500 — is that the EAFE Value Index, through exposure to cyclical and shorter-duration sectors, such as financials, materials, industrials, and energy, presents a much more diversified universe when compared to the tech-laden S&P 500 (Exhibits 3a and 3b). This is important because, while technology remains a vibrant investment opportunity, we believe a much broader subset of sectors and industries appear well positioned to benefit from future earnings trends.

*Inflation as measured by theconsumer price index reflects the annual percentage change in the cost to the average consumer of acquiring a basket of goods and services that may be fixed or changed at specified intervals, such as yearly. This indicator denotes the percentage change over each previous year of the constant price (base year 2015) series in United States dollars. International Financial Statistics database, International Monetary Fund (IMF) 12/31/25.

Earnings trends should benefit many

The parallels between today’s market environment and that of the early 2000s — inflation, interest rates, relative valuation, concentration risk, peak US dollar — are undeniable. Perhaps more importantly, however, while technology and artificial intelligence will be an important part of our daily lives, we believe future investment trends will likely benefit a wider cohort of sectors and industries outside of the technology-centric US companies of the past decade, and the  long-standing benefits of diversification will play an increasingly important part of client portfolios going forward. 

These trends are likely to include increased capex (versus just technology-focused opex), infrastructure upgrades, energy and the energy transition, defense and national security, and the reshoring and localization of supply chains, just to name a few. And although many US companies stand to benefit from these trends, so too do many international companies. While the US dominates the technology landscape globally, it would be naïve to assume that all the best companies in the world across a wide subset of sectors and industries reside in a single region or country. Further, should elevated inflation hang around longer than expected, banks could continue to be beneficiaries of higher rates as long as the economy doesn’t dip into a protracted recession. This is particularly true for international banks, which have dealt with stringent regulations and depressed net interest income since the sovereign banking crisis and are now dramatically de-risked and de-levered, consolidated, and still trading at what we believe in many cases to be attractive valuations.

Diversification 

While the connections we’ve made above between the lead-up to the 2000s cycle and today are important, we shouldn’t lose sight of the big picture: the long-term benefits of diversification. Until last year, the recent stretch of rolling five-year US outperformance versus the EAFE Value (as of December 31, 2024) was the longest in the past 40 years. In fact, despite the strong performance of international stocks in 2025, the recent level of US relative outperformance versus the broader international market has never been witnessed in history in terms of magnitude, which to us appears extremely stretched (to say the least) at today’s levels (Exhibit 4). At some point, as it always has in the past, its likely this relative performance leadership may reverse course, and investors may stand to benefit from the virtues of diversification.

In addition to its strong performance last year, for long-term investors, an allocation to the international value asset class can be a great diversifier to US exposure in an equity portfolio. The historical benefits of diversification are well known in the investing community. Not only does the international value asset class offer more diversification today, even when compared to both the international core and international growth asset classes, but that level of diversification, when looked at correlatively, is at the widest level we’ve witnessed historically, and in fact has increased in recent years (Exhibits 5a and 5b).

Conclusion

While no two periods are identical, there are several similarities between today and the eight-year period that began in the early eighties, when international value stocks strongly outperformed their US counterparts. Whether looking at inflation or interest rates, the value of the US dollar, valuation differential or simply the heightened concentration risk in US indices, the similarities are striking. Perhaps more importantly, coming out of a world of zero inflation and zero interest rates where diversification proved a headwind for performance, the outsized diversification benefits of an allocation to the international value asset class, in our opinion, could prove valuable to investors over the years to come.  

Important Risk Considerations: Investments in certain markets can involve greater risk and volatility because of adverse market, currency, economic, industry, political, regulatory, geopolitical, or other conditions. Stock markets and investments in individual stocks are volatile and can decline significantly in response to, or investor perception of, issuer, market, economic, industry, political, regulatory, geopolitical and other conditions.

“Standard & Poor’s^_®“ and S&P “S&P^_®“ are registered trademarks of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC (“S&P”) and Dow Jones is a registered trademark of Dow Jones Trademark Holdings LLC (“Dow Jones”) and have been licensed for use by S&P Dow Jones Indices LLC and sublicensed for certain purposes by MFS. The S&P 500^_® is a product of S&P Dow Jones Indices LLC, and has been licensed for use by MFS. MFS’s Products are not sponsored, endorsed, sold or promoted by S&P Dow Jones Indices LLC, Dow Jones, S&P, or their respective affiliates, and neither S&P Dow Jones Indices LLC, Dow Jones, S&P, their respective affiliates make any representation regarding the advisability of investing in such products. 

MSCI makes no express or implied warranties or representations and shall have no liability whatsoever with respect to any MSCI data contained herein. The MSCI data may not be further redistributed or used as a basis for other indices or any securities or financial products. This report is not approved, reviewed or produced by MSCI.

The views expressed are those of the author(s) and are subject to change at any time. These views are for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon as a recommendation to purchase any security or as a solicitation or investment advice. No forecasts can be guaranteed. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.