Are the Hawks Back?
FEATURING
Pilar Gomez-Bravo
Co-CIO, Fixed Income,
Portfolio Manager
Benoit Anne
Senior Marketing Director
Head of Marketing Insights
In brief
- Global monetary policy has shifted from easing to holding or hiking, reducing the case for broad duration bets
- With credit valuations stretched across markets, defensive carry and diversification matter more than chasing beta or mispriced premia for duration, credit, or liquidity risks
- A truly global, multi-sector approach is best placed to find dispersion across countries, curves, sectors, and issuers
Global fixed income is entering a new phase. The hawks are back and credit valuations look stretched across most segments, while inflation, geopolitics, and the AI investment cycle continue to add layers of complexity. In our view, the challenge is no longer about timing the next move in rates or spreads. It’s about constructing portfolios that can navigate a market where directional opportunities are limited and where value lies in diversified carry, liquidity, and security selection that takes advantage of dispersion.
The hawks are back: A new global rate regime
The global monetary cycle has decisively shifted as central banks are growing more hawkish and those that were expected to ease, notably the Fed and the Bank of England, appear to be on hold. We believe this shift is unlikely to reverse quickly: labor markets remain resilient, inflation is sticky, and even expectations around the new Fed chair have moved in a more hawkish direction.
With most central banks now fairly priced, we believe that broad directional duration bets are no longer where the opportunity sits. Instead, we think investors increasingly need to do some of the work that central banks have stepped back from, particularly around forward guidance. This will mean focusing on yield curves and country-level relative value rather than overall directional duration.
Risk radar: Inflation, geopolitics, and the AI complex
Three risks dominate our 12-month horizon. Inflation remains the most important: how persistent it proves to be, and what second-order effects it generates, will determine how long the central banks need to be more restrictive.
Geopolitics remain a constant concern, with the Strait of Hormuz unresolved and political cycles approaching in the US and France. Each of these could cause supply shocks or policy uncertainty.
The third key risk is related to the AI investment complex. The risk extends beyond fixed income supply: an equity market correction could meaningfully weigh on the higher-income consumption that has been supporting US growth. These risks are interconnected, and we believe that monitoring them holistically — particularly where AI, credit, and equity markets intersect — is increasingly important.
Carry vs. compression: Navigating stretched valuations
Credit looks expensive almost everywhere. In our view, it is difficult to argue that any version of credit — public or private, US or European, investment grade or high yield — is cheap. With limited room for spread compression, returns will rely more heavily on carry, but carry, as we often say, works until it doesn’t. The key question becomes how defensive the carry actually is. The objective is to construct a portfolio of defensive carry together with targeted compression ideas in order to earn income from solid fundamentals globally. Short-duration US high yield in certain sectors, IG barbells, and selected positioning in emerging markets all offer ways to earn yield without overreaching. In mortgages, we are more selective, finding value in specific derivatives rather than new commercial mortgage-backed securities deals. We prefer exposure in the senior part of the capital structure, focusing on intermediate maturities and reducing spread duration, with a focus on liquidity.
Where dispersion lives: Sectors, quality, and security selection
In a market with few obvious beta opportunities, dispersion is increasingly what differentiates outcomes. Within IG, sector dispersion is modest, but there are still differences in sector valuations in US versus Europe that provide some relative value opportunities. While the macro fundamental backdrop is more supportive in the US, the technicals are more supportive of European credit exposure. In high yield, dispersion is largely a quality story, and we would caution against reaching too far down into lower-rated names.
At the sector level, energy has become more compelling following developments around the Strait of Hormuz, with earnings tailwinds and reasonable valuations. We continue to like financials, utilities, and energy, and we prefer to avoid more cyclical areas such as autos. AI exposure, in our view, is often better expressed through selective datacenter or other project finance than long-duration investment grade.
Global multi-sector positioning: Defensive, diversified, liquid
We believe that our highest-conviction ideas come from working closely with analysts to identify the right issuers within the right themes. Currently, we are particularly focused on defensive, diversified, and liquid positioning given the uncertainty facing fixed income markets.
Credit
We continue to favor credit carry, but not at maximum overweight, recognizing that valuations leave limited room for spread compression. Within investment grade, we maintain a constructive bias but look to express it through barbells and selective regional tilts, with dispersion between US and European IG offering some opportunity. In high yield, we remain modestly underexposed relative to neutral and are working with our analysts to extract higher-conviction, shorter-duration positions in selective sectors rather than reaching for broad market beta. Within emerging markets, we prefer sovereigns over corporates. This is not because corporates lack merit, but because in our view, liquidity matters at this point in the cycle, and sovereign exposure leaves us better placed to provide liquidity when corrections occur. We also see value in crossover positioning rather than pushing too far up in quality. In securitized, mortgages are largely serving as a source of funds for more attractive opportunities elsewhere; we do not see significant room for rates to fall further, and we find better risk-adjusted value in selective mortgage derivatives than in new CMBS deals or agency pass-throughs.
Duration
We are slightly overweight duration overall, but the more important point is how that duration is expressed. Rather than taking a broad directional view, we are emphasizing country and curve positioning. We continue to like Canada as a place to take duration risk and are looking at Australia, where the central bank has already moved meaningfully. In Japan, we have some long-end exposure to Japanese government bonds while remaining underweight the country overall. In the US, we still see merit in 2s10s flattener exposure, though Fed dynamics may argue for a more steepener-oriented stance going forward.
Currency
We have been underweight the US dollar to varying degrees for some time but are tactically looking to reduce that underweight. Monetary policy divergence, weaker European growth indicators, and crowded bearish positioning all argue for less negative dollar exposure. The dollar also offers some defensive characteristics in risk-off scenarios, providing an additional reason to lean less negative at the margin. The longer-term secular case for the dollar remains less clear, however, and we would caution against turning structurally overweight.
Conclusion
Global fixed income today demands a different mindset. With directional rate trades less compelling and credit broadly expensive, success depends on constructing portfolios that combine defensive carry, genuine diversification, and the flexibility to act when dislocations occur. The opportunity set is global, but it is dispersed and increasingly idiosyncratic. In our view, those who can stay invested while preserving liquidity, and who can find dispersion across countries, curves, sectors and issuers, will be best placed to navigate what comes next.
The views expressed in this are those of MFS, and are subject to change at any time. These views should not be relied upon as investment advice, as securities recommendations, or as an indication of trading intent on behalf of any MFS investment product.
Distributed by: U.S. – MFS Institutional Advisors, Inc. (“MFSI”), MFS Investment Management and MFS Fund Distributors, Inc., Member SIPC; Latin America – MFS International Ltd.; Canada – MFS Investment Management Canada Limited.; Note to UK and Switzerland readers: Issued in the UK and Switzerland by MFS International (U.K.) Limited (“MIL UK”), a private limited company registered in England and Wales with the company number 03062718, and authorised and regulated in the conduct of investment business by the UK Financial Conduct Authority. MIL UK, an indirect subsidiary of MFS®, has its registered office at One Carter Lane, London, EC4V 5ER.; Note to Europe (ex UK and Switzerland) readers: Issued in Europe by MFS Investment Management (Lux) S.à r.l. (MFS Lux) – authorized under Luxembourg law as a management company for Funds domiciled in Luxembourg and which both provide products and investment services to institutional investors and is registered office is at S.a r.l. 4 Rue Albert Borschette, Luxembourg L-1246. Tel: 352 2826 12800. This material shall not be circulated or distributed to any person other than to professional investors (as permitted by local regulations) and should not be relied upon or distributed to persons where such reliance or distribution would be contrary to local regulation; Singapore – MFS International Singapore Pte. Ltd. (CRN 201228809M); Australia/New Zealand - MFS International Australia Pty Ltd (“MFS Australia”) (ABN 68 607 579 537) holds an Australian financial services licence number 485343. MFS Australia is regulated by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission.; Hong Kong - MFS International (Hong Kong) Limited (“MIL HK”), a private limited company licensed and regulated by the Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission (the “SFC”). MIL HK is approved to engage in dealing in securities and asset management regulated activities and may provide certain investment services to “professional investors” as defined in the Securities and Futures Ordinance (“SFO”).; For Professional Investors in China – MFS Financial Management Consulting (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. 2801-12, 28th Floor, 100 Century Avenue, Shanghai World Financial Center, Shanghai Pilot Free Trade Zone, 200120, China, a Chinese limited liability company registered to provide financial management consulting services.; Japan - MFS Investment Management K.K., is registered as a Financial Instruments Business Operator, Kanto Local Finance Bureau (FIBO) No.312, a member of the Investment Management Association of Japan. As fees to be borne by investors vary depending upon circumstances such as products, services, investment period and market conditions, the total amount nor the calculation methods cannot be disclosed in advance. All investments involve risks, including market fluctuation and investors may lose the principal amount invested. Investors should obtain and read the prospectus and/or document set forth in Article 37-3 of Financial Instruments and Exchange Act carefully before making the investments. For readers in Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Oman, and UAE (excluding the DIFC and ADGM). In Qatar strictly for sophisticated investors and high net worth individuals only. In Bahrain, for sophisticated institutions only: The information contained in this document is intended strictly for professional investors. The information contained in this document, does not constitute and should not be construed as an offer of, invitation or proposal to make an offer for, recommendation to apply for or an opinion or guidance on a financial product, service and/or strategy. Whilst great care has been taken to ensure that the information contained in this document is accurate, no responsibility can be accepted for any errors, mistakes or omissions or for any action taken in reliance thereon. You may only reproduce, circulate and use this document (or any part of it) with the consent of MFS international U.K. Ltd (“MIL UK”). The information contained in this document is for information purposes only. It is not intended for and should not be distributed to, or relied upon by, members of the public. The information contained in this document, may contain statements that are not purely historical in nature but are “forward-looking statements”. These include, amongst other things, projections, forecasts or estimates of income. These forward-looking statements are based upon certain assumptions, some of which are described in other relevant documents or materials. If you do not understand the contents of this document, you should consult an authorised financial adviser. Please note that any materials sent by the issuer (MIL UK) have been sent electronically from offshore. South Africa - This document, and the information contained is not intended and does not constitute, a public offer of securities in South Africa and accordingly should not be construed as such. This document is not for general circulation to the public in South Africa. This document has not been approved by the Financial Sector Conduct Authority and neither MFS International (U.K.) Limited nor its funds are registered for public sale in South Africa. Massachusetts Financial Services®.