decorative
decorative

The Potential Benefits for European Investors of a Strategic Allocation to Emerging Market Debt

In brief

  • We believe European investors should consider a strategic allocation to EMD. 
  • EMD allows investors to gain access to higher-growth economies, and the asset class has matured in terms of market size, liquidity and credit quality. 
  • The low correlation between local and hard currency EMD suggests that a blended approach is optimal. 
  • EMD provides potential diversification benefits in broader portfolios, given the low correlation with other assets. 

After a tumultuous year for capital markets in 2022, investors will likely face more uncertainty in 2023. However, there are several bright spots — inflation is beginning to moderate, central banks are slowing the pace of tightening and fixed income valuations are now attractive across many sectors.

Against this backdrop, emerging market debt (EMD) may warrant a closer look for European investors as it offers attractive yields relative to other fixed income asset classes with lower volatility than equity assets.

While emerging market investing is familiar to European investors, it is often underrepresented across portfolios. Much like emerging market equities, EMD allows investors to gain access to higher-growth and higher-productivity economies compared to developed market economies. Additionally, EMD has matured significantly as an asset class over the past 30 years. In the early 1990s, there were few countries in the index, and crises from the mid-1990s to the early 2000s resulted in the asset class being perceived as a high-risk proposition. Today, many EMD issuers have robust debt profiles and better credit quality than in the past. Furthermore, the depth and breadth of liquidity has increased as the size of the overall market has grown to approximately €4.7 trillion,1 and EMD now comprises nearly 16% of the global bond universe.

Emerging market debt can be divided into two main sub–asset classes: hard currency and local currency. Hard currency EMD refers to debt issued primarily in USD but also in euro and yen. Local currency EMD refers to debt issued in the issuer’s domestic currency. Hard currency EMD can be hedged back into euros or left unhedged. For local currency EMD, hedging the currencies is often impractical because it can be a complex and costly process. 

What are the key portfolio characteristics of EMD? 

In considering an allocation to EMD, it is important to understand the volatility and correlation characteristics of the asset class. It is often assumed that local currency EMD is more volatile than hard currency EMD. However, the volatility profile depends on the home currency of the investor. As shown in Exhibit 2, local currency EMD has exhibited higher volatility over the past 10 years for US investors, averaging 11.4% as compared to hard currency EMD volatility of 9.0% over the same period. In euro terms, however, the volatility of local currency EMD has been much lower at 9.2%, comparable to unhedged hard currency EMD, which also averaged 9.2%. Hedging the US dollar exposure from hard currency EMD reduced the overall volatility slightly to 9.0%.

Exhibit 3 shows the correlations between the different EMD assets, and we see a potential diversification benefit between hard and local currency with a correlation of roughly 0.7, varying slightly depending on whether the hard currency is hedged to euros or not.

Assessing EMD in a euro investor’s portfolio 

To analyze the potential benefits of adding EMD in a euro denominated portfolio, we estimated the potential returns that a euro-based investor might experience over the next 10-years. We started with current yields and then made adjustments for hedging costs, default rates and currency depreciation based on current market conditions. We then estimated volatility based on historical data and calculated expected Sharpe ratios, as shown in Exhibit 4.

Using these assumptions, we modeled varying combinations of local and hard currency EMD, as shown in Exhibit 5.

We see that the highest Sharpe ratios occur within a range of 40%/60% and 80%/20% hard currency/local currency EMD and the Sharpe ratio for the blended portfolios are slightly higher than either unblended portfolio. This synergy is a result of the low correlation between hard and local currency EMD that we saw in Exhibit 3. This leads us to conclude that a 50/50 blend of hard and local currency is potentially a good starting point to implement the asset class for euro investors. 

While the calculations in Exhibit 5 assume that the hard currency EMD is hedged to euros, it should be noted that we obtained similar results when using an unhedged variation of the hard currency EMD. We suggest that euro-based investors hedge the hard currency strategically but allow leeway to reduce the hedge tactically as market conditions warrant.

Integration with other asset classes

Another factor to consider is the correlation of EMD with other assets commonly held in euro denominated portfolios, as shown in Exhibit 6.

Those correlations, ranging from 0.42 to 0.79, indicate that EMD could potentially help diversify broader portfolio risk.

Conclusion

We believe European investors may want to  consider a strategic allocation to EMD. EMD allows investors to gain access to higher-growth economies, and the asset class has matured in terms of market size, liquidity and credit quality. The low correlation between local and hard currency EMD suggest that a blended approach may be the optimal one. EMD also provides potential diversification benefits in broader portfolios, given the low correlation with other assets.

 

Endnotes

1 Source: J.P. Morgan, market capitalization of JPMorgan EMBI Global Index, JPMorgan CEMBI Broad Diversified Index and JPMorgan GBI-EM Global Diversified Index, as of December 2022, converted to euros.

2 Estimated hard currency returns are based on index yields or the JPMorgan EMBI Global Diversified and JPMorgan GBI-EM Global Diversified Indices as of 12/30/2022 adjusted as shown below to reflect estimated cost of hedging hard currency index, long term historical average of default and recovery and projected differential in inflation between Eurozone and countries represented in the local currency index. Estimated default rate based on weighted average sovereign net annual foreign currency credit rating default for AA, A and BAA rated securities from 1975 to 2021. 

 

 

Capital Markets View is for informational purposes only and any general commentary on market activity, industry or sector trends, or other broad based economic or political conditions does not constitute a recommendation or investment advice. The expected returns presented are hypothetical in nature and are not representative of an actual account. Certain assumptions have been made for modeling purposes and are unlikely to be realized. No representation or warranty is made as to the reasonableness of the assumptions made or that all assumptions used in calculating returns have been stated or fully considered. Projections and forward-looking assumptions are no guarantees of future performance. The expected returns are not targeted or projected performance for any MFS portfolio or advisory service.

Source: Bloomberg Index Services Limited. BLOOMBERG® is a trademark and service mark of Bloomberg Finance L.P. and its affiliates (collectively “Bloomberg”). Bloomberg or Bloomberg’s licensors own all proprietary rights in the Bloomberg Indices. Bloomberg neither approves or endorses this material or guarantees the accuracy or completeness of any information herein, or makes any warranty, express or implied, as to the results to be obtained therefrom and, to the maximum extent allowed by law, neither shall have any liability or responsibility for injury or damages arising in connection therewith.

Information has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but J.P. Morgan does not warrant its completeness or accuracy. The Index is used with permission. The Index may not be copied, used, or distributed without J.P. Morgan’s prior written approval. Copyright 2022, J.P. Morgan Chase & Co. All rights reserved.

Index data source: MSCI. MSCI makes no express or implied warranties or representations and shall have no liability whatsoever with respect to any MSCI data contained herein. The MSCI data may not be further redistributed or used as a basis for other indices or any securities or financial products. This report is not approved, reviewed or produced by MSCI.

“Standard & Poor’s®” and S&P “S&P®” are registered trademarks of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC (“S&P”) and Dow Jones is a registered trademark of Dow Jones Trademark Holdings LLC (“Dow Jones”) and have been licensed for use by S&P Dow Jones Indices LLC and sublicensed for certain purposes by MFS. The S&P 500® is a product of S&P Dow Jones Indices LLC, and has been licensed for use by MFS. MFS’s Products are not sponsored, endorsed, sold or promoted by S&P Dow Jones Indices LLC, Dow Jones, S&P, or their respective affiliates, and neither S&P Dow Jones Indices LLC, Dow Jones, S&P, their respective affiliates make any representation regarding the advisability of investing in such products.

The views expressed are those of the author(s) and are subject to change at any time. These views are for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon as a recommendation to purchase any security or as a solicitation or investment advice. No forecasts can be guaranteed.

54060.1
close video